On Oct 7, 2007, at 23:50, Jeffrey Altman wrote: > Not at all. In fact, we could mark the private symbols as NONAME and > make them only accessible via the ordinal if we really wanted to make > them private.
As long as our own libraries can still access them. Perhaps it would be a good idea... > Of course, that would break third party apps that currently rely on > their presence. Of which there should be none, right? Ken _______________________________________________ kfwdev mailing list kfwdev@mit.edu http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/kfwdev
