[ka...@mit.edu - Sun Aug 26 21:38:43 2012]:

> [tlyu - Sat Aug 25 21:16:00 2012]:
> 
> > "Benjamin Kaduk via RT" <r...@krbdev.mit.edu> writes:
> >
> >
> > What branch is d394495b7c2b51 in?
> 
> Hmm, it did not seem to be in my main local repo, but was a SHA1 on my

Because that was a typo (hand copy/pasted, I guess) for 
d394495b57c2b51305f105ac11493892f5fd1484 (difference at the ninth character), 
which 
does exist in my local repository.  Weird git mystery solved, though rc.exe 
remains open.
(If I remember correctly, this revision does not build properly on Windows even 
absent the 
rc.exe issue, due to FindCCacheDisplayElem() not being prototyped early enough 
in 
LeashView.cpp, so this question is a bit moot.  The kfw-bad2 branch on my 
github has what 
seems to be the most recent entry in my reflog that still has the code which 
fails to build with 
the rc.exe error.

I did some reading about rc and the font directive, and it seems like the 
change in question 
here should be a no-op, according to the documentation.  I am somewhat inclined 
to just use 
the two-argument form of the directive with a less worried commit message, and 
not block 
on understanding the behavior described in this ticket.
_______________________________________________
kfwdev mailing list
kfwdev@mit.edu
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/kfwdev

Reply via email to