On Tue, 2006-09-12 at 07:23 -0700, Tom Rini wrote: > On Mon, Sep 11, 2006 at 09:21:43PM -0700, Piet Delaney wrote: > > > > where > > > it flows down to (w/o extracting and redoing the changes), which is why > > > I want people to still send regular GNU patches, for the time being. > > > > How is Andrew dealing with git flows yet still being able to make broken > > out patches? > > He tracks external git trees as a single patch. But when the external > tree wishes to submit itself for inclusion to Linus, the maintainer > sends the patch set. >
Sigh, I tried the git repository in a simple environment with only a SINGLE CPU. It seems to run as expected other than the back trace being totally useless. I had to set back trace limit 100 to prevent ddd/gdb from looping indefinitely trying to walk up the stack. This is totally stupid. gdb only sees the top level function! I recommend staying with the dwarf code till a simpler mechanism works. That what Andrew was doing a few day ago. Seems like a much better approach. It's not even worthy of a debug session shakedown as it is. Same gdb with my 2.6.13 kgdb patch works fine. -piet -- Piet Delaney Phone: (408) 200-5256 Blue Lane Technologies Fax: (408) 200-5299 10450 Bubb Rd. Cupertino, Ca. 95014 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
_______________________________________________ Kgdb-bugreport mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kgdb-bugreport
