Hello.
Konstantin Baydarov wrote:
> The MIPS part.
Why you (logically) haven't merged both patches into a single one?
Well, that way it would be simpler to apply to patchset of course but the
patch should have been monolithic
> Signed-off-by: Konstantin Baydarov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Acked-by: Sergei Shtylyov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> arch/mips/kernel/kgdb.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> Index: ko_2_6_24_3_kgdb/arch/mips/kernel/kgdb.c
> ===================================================================
> --- ko_2_6_24_3_kgdb.orig/arch/mips/kernel/kgdb.c
> +++ ko_2_6_24_3_kgdb/arch/mips/kernel/kgdb.c
> @@ -95,7 +95,7 @@ void handle_exception(struct pt_regs *re
> if (fixup_exception(regs))
> return;
>
> - if (atomic_read(&debugger_active))
> + if (atomic_read(&debugger_active) && !atomic_read(&debugger_exiting))
> kgdb_nmihook(smp_processor_id(), regs);
>
> if (atomic_read(&kgdb_setting_breakpoint))
WBR, Sergei
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Kgdb-bugreport mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kgdb-bugreport
