On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 02:29:20AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-09-24 at 15:30 -0500, Jason Wessel wrote:
> > Jiri,
> > 
> > Can you try this simple patch which is attached?
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > On 09/24/2010 01:04 PM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> > > while starting kgdb early debug on latest tip tree,
> > > I got SIGSEGV inside kernel in following location:
> > >
> > >   
> > [clip]
> > > I found out it's due to foolowing commit, that's causing the init code
> > > to be called without the ctx field being defined...
> > >
> > > commit c3f00c70276d8ae82578c8b773e2db657f69a478
> > > Author: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
> > > Date:   Wed Aug 18 14:37:15 2010 +0200
> > >
> > >
> > >   
> > 
> > I took a look at the tip core, and the ctx parameter is no longer passed
> > into the perf_event_alloc() from perf_event_create_kernel_counter() kgdb
> > no longer gets it filled in for free.
> > 
> > The reality is that kgdb never had a true context or a way to mark the
> > hw breakpoint as a kernel only context for the hw breakpoint
> > reservations.  The patch is only a short term fix perhaps until on of
> > the perf guys explains the right way to use it. :-)
> 
> Argh, yes, its using the ctx rather early.. we cannot have a context
> before we've initialized the event, and here it looks like hw_breakpoint
> wants to use the context to initialize the event, chick, egg, etc..
> 
> Frederic, anything we can do about that?



Jason's patch is partially good, it just lacks one place to handle.
Jiri, can you test that?

diff --git a/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c b/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c
index d71a987..d727c58 100644
--- a/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c
+++ b/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c
@@ -134,7 +134,7 @@ fetch_bp_busy_slots(struct bp_busy_slots *slots, struct 
perf_event *bp,
                    enum bp_type_idx type)
 {
        int cpu = bp->cpu;
-       struct task_struct *tsk = bp->ctx->task;
+       struct task_struct *tsk = bp->ctx ? bp->ctx->task : NULL;
 
        if (cpu >= 0) {
                slots->pinned = per_cpu(nr_cpu_bp_pinned[type], cpu);
@@ -213,7 +213,7 @@ toggle_bp_slot(struct perf_event *bp, bool enable, enum 
bp_type_idx type,
               int weight)
 {
        int cpu = bp->cpu;
-       struct task_struct *tsk = bp->ctx->task;
+       struct task_struct *tsk = bp->ctx ? bp->ctx->task : NULL;
 
        /* Pinned counter cpu profiling */
        if (!tsk) {



 
> > differences between files attachment
> > (0001-Fix-null-dereference-when-using-early-kgdb.patch)
> > From 17f3febd001a26aee9a75c61152b60b7e0ae1ea9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > From: Jason Wessel <[email protected]>
> > Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2010 15:21:11 -0500
> > Subject: [PATCH] Fix null dereference when using early kgdb
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Jason Wessel <[email protected]>
> > ---
> >  kernel/hw_breakpoint.c |    2 +-
> >  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c b/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c
> > index 3b714e8..3c7ccdf 100644
> > --- a/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c
> > +++ b/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c
> > @@ -213,7 +213,7 @@ toggle_bp_slot(struct perf_event *bp, bool enable, enum 
> > bp_type_idx type,
> >            int weight)
> >  {
> >     int cpu = bp->cpu;
> > -   struct task_struct *tsk = bp->ctx->task;
> > +   struct task_struct *tsk = bp->ctx ? bp->ctx->task : NULL;
> >  
> >     /* Pinned counter cpu profiling */
> >     if (!tsk) {
> 
> That'll probably screw over some accounting, not sure what tsk is used
> for there.


Nope it's ok. tsk is used to know if we are dealing with
a task/cpu bound breakpoint or a cpu wide bound one.

If tsk ends up being NULL, it will think it's a cpu wide bound
breakpoint, which it is in the case of kgdb breakpoints.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Start uncovering the many advantages of virtual appliances
and start using them to simplify application deployment and
accelerate your shift to cloud computing.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/novell-sfdev2dev
_______________________________________________
Kgdb-bugreport mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kgdb-bugreport

Reply via email to