Citando Jason Wessel <jason.wes...@windriver.com>: > On 11/06/2014 05:41 PM, Pete Delaney wrote: > >>> I'm wondering how complex (or possible) would be to instrument >>> locally KGDB on the target machine, i. e., somehow remove the >>> serial connection (and > the host machine, GDB) from the setup, >>> since on this new scenario the host (GDB) and the target (KGDB) >>> would run on the same machine. Is this idea as > absurd as it >>> possibly seems? >> >> Yea, I suspect so. > > > I guess it depends what you are trying to do. If you don't need to > stop the target system there is no reason you cannot just attach gdb > to the /dev/kmem. > > Cheers, > Jason.
First of all, sorry for the late, late reply. Ideally (and since I'm using KGDB to do some fault-injection, surely not it's main purpose), the target would not stop, so the intrusion would be minimal. I'll research more on this, thanks for the suggestion. Regards, João ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Comprehensive Server Monitoring with Site24x7. Monitor 10 servers for $9/Month. Get alerted through email, SMS, voice calls or mobile push notifications. Take corrective actions from your mobile device. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=154624111&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Kgdb-bugreport mailing list Kgdb-bugreport@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kgdb-bugreport
