Hi,

On Tue, Oct 8, 2019 at 6:21 AM Daniel Thompson
<daniel.thomp...@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> Currently kdb_read_get_key() contains complex control flow that, on
> close inspection, turns out to be unnecessary. In particular:
>
> 1. It is impossible to enter the branch conditioned on (escape_delay == 1)
>    except when the loop enters with (escape_delay == 2) allowing us to
>    combine the branches.
>
> 2. Most of the code conditioned on (escape_delay == 2) simply modifies
>    local data and then breaks out of the loop causing the function to
>    return escape_data[0].
>
> 3. Based on #2 there is not actually any need to ever explicitly set
>    escape_delay to 2 because we it is much simpler to directly return
>    escape_data[0] instead.
>
> 4. escape_data[0] is, for all but one exit path, known to be '\e'.
>
> Simplify the code based on these observations.
>
> There is a subtle (and harmless) change of behaviour resulting from this
> simplification: instead of letting the escape timeout after ~1998
> milliseconds we now timeout after ~2000 milliseconds
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thomp...@linaro.org>
> ---
>  kernel/debug/kdb/kdb_io.c | 38 ++++++++++++++------------------------
>  1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)

Looks great.  My only comment is that since this was the 2nd patch in
the series I spent a whole bunch of time deducing all these same
things when reviewing the first patch.  :-P

Reviewed-by: Douglas Anderson <diand...@chromium.org>


_______________________________________________
Kgdb-bugreport mailing list
Kgdb-bugreport@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kgdb-bugreport

Reply via email to