Mark, On Wed, Sep 6, 2023 at 9:06 AM Douglas Anderson <diand...@chromium.org> wrote: > > +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_ACPI_PARKING_PROTOCOL > +void arch_send_wakeup_ipi(unsigned int cpu) > +{ > + /* > + * We use a scheduler IPI to wake the CPU as this avoids the need for > a > + * dedicated IPI and we can safely handle spurious scheduler IPIs. > + */ > + arch_smp_send_reschedule(cpu);
I was backporting this to our ChromeOS kernels and our build test bot noticed that arch_smp_send_reschedule() didn't exist in older kernels. That's fine--I can always adjust this patch when backporting or cherry-pick extra patches, but it made me wonder. Is there a reason you chose to use arch_smp_send_reschedule() directly here instead of smp_send_reschedule()? I guess the only difference is that you're bypassing the tracing. Is that on purpose? Should we add a comment about it, or change this to smp_send_reschedule()? Thanks! -Doug _______________________________________________ Kgdb-bugreport mailing list Kgdb-bugreport@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kgdb-bugreport