On 10 June 2010 15:23, Dick Hollenbeck <[email protected]> wrote: > Brian Sidebotham wrote: >>> Thanks for handling this. I probably wouldn't be able to get to it for >>> at least another two weeks. >>> >>> Wayne >>> >> >> Echo that, thanks for dealing with this patch Dick. If the GUI change >> adds too much work, feel free to push this back to me to change, as >> the configuration loading and saving will have to change too (as they >> use for( size_t i=0; i<DEFAULT_NUMBER_OF_FIELDS; i++) loops). >> >> I have some free time at the weekend where I could sort it out if needed. >> >> Also just to add, I've been getting on with bazaar version control >> really well, it proved very handy with this patch as I was easily able >> to create a quick branch and then occasionally merge with the testing >> branch head to keep it relevant. >> >> Best Regards, >> >> Brian. >> > > I'll see. Give me a chance to roll up my sleeves and look. Hope to > start tonight.
No problem, just shout if needed. > I've got a fairly slick BOM algorithm that I wrote in Java, and want to > jettison that into the eeschema so I can stop maintaining the Java > version. It reconciles all the field names across parts, and even > collates the common parts into totals as a separate table. So you have > "one part per line item rows", and then separately you have collated > rows, all in one CSV file. > > > Dick This would be a great feature enhancement! I would certainly make good use of it, and I think plenty of other people would find that a massive improvement too. Best Regards, Brian. _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
