On 03/21/2011 12:58 PM, Dick Hollenbeck wrote: > > 1)))))))))))))) > > Wayne, > > Any problems changing: > > (visible YES) > > to > > [visible] > > > Reasoning: > > I am looking for conciseness. This means having defaults do the right > thing, most of the time, so that they can be omitted from the expression. > > > My thinking for properties, is that most are not visible (this is debatable). > > This proposed is more concise, and defaults to non visible in the absence of > 'visible'.
Unfortunately, the normal case for pins is that they are visible (a normal case which is reversed from properties, where the normal case is hidden). So I may have talked myself out of this. One consistent way forward may be to stick with (visible yes|no) as originally planned. Dick > > 2))))))))))))))))) > > Jean-Pierre or anyone else, > > Anyone have and second thoughts on the need to continue with both a pin name > AND a pin number, going forward? I cannot remember why we need both. > > > Thanks, > > > Dick > _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
