On Sun, May 12, 2013 at 09:08:49PM -0500, Dick Hollenbeck wrote: > Until I recommitted all text files, I was having problems with false diffs. > This is the > reason for the *rules_check* repo. To show that that repo works. If the > test passes, I > can do a similar commit for testing to cross the bridge once and for all. > > Unfortunately the attached "rules" file would have no effect it if only > existed in the > repo. You have to copy it where bazaar wants it, although we should put it > into the repo > for ease of standardization across all developer's systems. Bazaar > developers have > alluded to a possible future where one in the repo will be effective.
That's the same approach I used to try to fix. I agree with the false diff issue. However once everything is 'right' in the repo it should work. Why the bzr people did implement it as a postprocess step??? svn:eol-style works *way* better, too bad... The thing I didn't check is what happen when a win user does a commit. I hope it does the right thing (i.e. switch the CRLF to whatever the repo is configured to hold), otherwise it's useless. -- Lorenzo Marcantonio Logos Srl _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers Post to : kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
