I am also in favor of keeping simpler library names. The latest dialog works well on my side, pasting the table from the README.md as well. Great work there.
I'll try in the next few days to get a README.md generated for each pretty library. As for copying the whole table at once instead of going into each repository, would having an empty repository containing only a README.md be a good idea? On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 12:06 PM, Dick Hollenbeck <d...@softplc.com> wrote: > > >> Short term our best options are to encourage preparation of a > publishing guideline. That > >> document would talk about what constitutes a good library, > >> and how to prepare the > >> README.md file, and maybe even offer a wxPython script to prepare it > automatically. > > See > > https://github.com/liftoff-sr/pretty_footprints > > for a quick initial attempt I made at manual preparation this morning. It > allows: > > 1) quick copying and pasting of (fp_lib_table) element from HTML view at > bottom of page > into a blank row of DIALOG_FP_LIB_TABLE. > > 2) has hyperlinks to every *raw* format pretty file, (which when someone > adds (module) > s-expr clipboard pasting support to module editor, could be copied and > pasted from > webbrowser into module editor.) This offers yet another way just to grab > one footprint > without bringing in the whole library as in 1) above. > > > >
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers Post to : kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
