Great stuff, I'm already finding genuine (though rarely tripped) problems. On the embarrassing side, my code has a defect rate of about 2 per 1000 lines.
Bye-bye evenings - looks like I have some code to fix. - Cirilo On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 7:11 AM, Wayne Stambaugh <stambau...@gmail.com> wrote: > Mark Roszko was kind enough to set up a Coverity scan for KiCad at > https://scan.coverity.com/projects/3606?tab=analysis_settings. Thank > you Mark. I would at least like my lead developers to sign up and have > Mark give you access to see the scan results. If you see a high > severity issue that is in your code, please make sure it's not a false > positive and tag it as such or fix it if the issue is legitemate. At > the very least, we should shoot for no high severity issues. Obviously, > zero issues of any severity should be the goal but we have to start > somewhere. > > On the whole, the KiCad error rate is not as bad as I thought it might > be. We are currently at 1.52 per 1000 lines of code. The average for > open source projects larger than 1M lines of code is 0.65. Let's see if > we can do better than average. > > Cheers, > > Wayne > > _______________________________________________ > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers > Post to : kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp >
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers Post to : kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp