Hi, I'm cleaning up a bit in the codebase, and found that the ERC silently treats the ElectricPinType and TypeSheetLabel enums the same.
typedef enum { enum ElectricPinType { NET_INPUT, PIN_INPUT, NET_OUTPUT, PIN_OUTPUT, NET_BIDI, PIN_BIDI, NET_TRISTATE, PIN_TRISTATE, NET_UNSPECIFIED, PIN_PASSIVE, NET_TMAX /* Last value */ PIN_UNSPECIFIED, } TypeSheetLabel; PIN_POWER_IN, PIN_POWER_OUT, PIN_OPENCOLLECTOR, PIN_OPENEMITTER, PIN_NC, PIN_NMAX }; I don't like this at all, because it depends on the enum definitions being consistent (which they aren't, because PASSIVE != UNSPECIFIED), but cleaning this up isn't straightforward either. For just the ERC, it would be easy to map the label type to a pin type, but I'm not sure that this is sufficient. Can anyone who understands the ERC shed some light on this? Simon
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers Post to : kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp