mm ... bad (corrupted) IDs which show on Linux but not MSWin? Is there a difference between debug and release build? Perhaps even a compiler or platform dependent initialization (race condition)?
- Cirilo On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 11:28 AM, Chris Pavlina <[email protected]> wrote: > Okay, I definitely have no clue what's going on. On my system, out of > eleven items in the wxFlexGridSizer that holds the first set of options > items, exactly one responds properly to its mnemonic: > m_spinAutoSaveInterval. I cannot discern any way in which it is > different from the rest. Another responds to the *wrong* mnemonic: > m_spinBusWidth responds to the mnemonic for m_choiceUnits, two items > above it. WTF! The other nine just barf out the weird message about > wxPizza. All of the wxCheckBoxes in the bottom section work perfectly. > > Any wxwidgets wizards here? I'm at a complete loss. > > > On Wed, Aug 05, 2015 at 08:12:12PM -0400, Wayne Stambaugh wrote: > > They seem to work ok on windows so it must be wxGTK that is the issue. > > > > On 8/5/2015 6:09 PM, Chris Pavlina wrote: > > > Actually it is not a problem with my patch. It may be a wx bug or a > > > kicad bug - this needs further investigation. Maybe someone is > listening > > > who knows wx better? > > > > > > The mnemonics are broken even without my patch. Many items do not > > > respond. After trying to get them working, I have a pile of these in my > > > terminal: > > > > > > (eeschema:32117): Gtk-WARNING **: widget `wxPizza' isn't suitable for > mnemonic activation > > > > > > What the everliving /hell/ is a wxPizza. I can find very little > > > documentation on it, other than someone else also complaining that it > is > > > interfering with his events (with no follow-up). > > > > > > Anybody? > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Aug 05, 2015 at 06:02:02PM -0400, Wayne Stambaugh wrote: > > >> I'll hold off committing this until I see your update. > > >> > > >> On 8/5/2015 5:41 PM, Chris Pavlina wrote: > > >>> Indeed, something strange is going on with the mnemonics. It's not > > >>> responding to the correct ones in the correct places in this dialog. > > >>> Don't commit this. I'll have a closer look tonight. > > >>> > > >>> On Wed, Aug 05, 2015 at 05:39:34PM -0400, Jon Neal wrote: > > >>>> I really like the wording changes in the dialogs. They are much more > > >>>> consistent and understandable in my opinion. I am definitely +1 on > this. > > >>>> > > >>>> However, I think this needs a bit more work as the mnemonics aren't > working > > >>>> on my system. (I have alerted Chris to this on IRC, just want to > make sure > > >>>> this doesn't get committed accidentally). > > >>>> > > >>>> Other than the marked letters/mnemonics not working correctly > everything > > >>>> else seems to be correct. > > >>>> > > >>>> Jon Neal > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 3:05 PM, Chris Pavlina < > [email protected]> > > >>>> wrote: > > >>>> > > >>>>> Here's a patch to fix the option dialog mnemonics. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> - Fix conflicting mnemonics in eeschema options > > >>>>> - Add mnemonics to pcbnew, modedit, libedit options > > >>>>> > > >>>>> While I was doing it, I also cleaned up the padding/spacing in the > > >>>>> dialogs (there were a few misaligned labels), and I removed an > obsolete > > >>>>> dialog DIALOG_LIBEDIT_DIMENSIONS (this appears to have been merged > into > > >>>>> DIALOG_LIBEDIT_OPTIONS a while ago and there is no remaining > codepath > > >>>>> that calls it). > > >>>>> > > >>>>> -- > > >>>>> Chris > > >>>>> > > >>>>> On Tue, Aug 04, 2015 at 02:28:47PM -0400, Wayne Stambaugh wrote: > > >>>>>> On 8/3/2015 1:02 PM, Chris Pavlina wrote: > > >>>>>>> Hi, > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> The keyboard mnemonics (underlined letters) in the eeschema and > libedit > > >>>>>>> config boxes are a bit messy. There is at least one conflict > (two items > > >>>>>>> sharing L), and many items missing mnemonics. > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> I could easily patch this, but I'd rather discuss: perhaps they > should > > >>>>>>> be removed? It is not usual to have mnemonics in large, > complicated > > >>>>>>> dialogs like this - they're not particularly useful there, and > they are > > >>>>>>> error-prone as the current state demonstrates. People forget to > add > > >>>>>>> them, or miss conflicts. Mnemonics are much more useful in > dialogs that > > >>>>>>> are used frequently like text edit dialogs, where a user might > want, > > >>>>> for > > >>>>>>> example, to jump quickly to the "text size" field. With so many > > >>>>> options, > > >>>>>>> nobody is going to remember the mnemonics anyway (note what > "mnemonic" > > >>>>>>> means: it's a memory aid!), and it doesn't save any time when > one has > > >>>>> to > > >>>>>>> squint at all the options to find the underlined letter. > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> Of course the possibility for inconsistency goes even farther: I > > >>>>> haven't > > >>>>>>> even checked the localizations to see how they behave. > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> Anybody else in favor of just removing them from these two > dialogs? The > > >>>>>>> pcbnew and modedit dialogs already do not use them, and most > other GUI > > >>>>>>> applications that I checked now also do not use them in their > > >>>>>>> Preferences boxes. > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> -- > > >>>>>>> Chris > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> While your logic make sense, my preference is to keep the > mnemonics, fix > > >>>>>> any duplicates, and add the missing ones in any offending > dialogs. I > > >>>>>> realize on some complex dialogs, it can be difficult to set unique > > >>>>>> mnemonics but that's pretty rare. There are still a lot of us old > > >>>>>> timers around who prefer our keyboards over reaching for the mouse > > >>>>>> whenever possible. I know it's passe and quaint but I'm not > ready to > > >>>>>> give it up just yet :) > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> _______________________________________________ > > >>>>>> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers > > >>>>>> Post to : [email protected] > > >>>>>> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers > > >>>>>> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp > > >>>>> > > >>>>> _______________________________________________ > > >>>>> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers > > >>>>> Post to : [email protected] > > >>>>> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers > > >>>>> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>> > > >>> _______________________________________________ > > >>> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers > > >>> Post to : [email protected] > > >>> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers > > >>> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp > > >>> > > >> > > >> > > >> _______________________________________________ > > >> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers > > >> Post to : [email protected] > > >> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers > > >> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers > > > Post to : [email protected] > > > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers > > > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers > > Post to : [email protected] > > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers > > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp > > _______________________________________________ > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers > Post to : [email protected] > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp >
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
