On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 12:00:58AM -0500, Mark Roszko wrote: > is just extremely silly and extra work compared to generate SEXPR > trees in memory like SEXPR represents in the first place. God forbid > you accidentally format that double wrong.
D'oh you actually want a full in-memory tree representation.. the full lisp way (made of cons cells, obviously :D) > Namely file size savings and sanity. Instead of all those ridiculous X Well these are trivial IMHO. The biggest horror for me is splitting one object in many data forms. I couldn't care less if the result is (data aa bb cc) or (data "asdf==")... of course the second one is better. Even better if you tagged it with a macro character like (data {asdf==}) so that the reader could know that {} denotes a base64 encoded blob (the {} is not lisp, in the '80 there was no base64 :P). -- Lorenzo Marcantonio CZ Srl - Parma _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers Post to : kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp