Yeah, the vias still have their size stored in the pcb file. On Sun, Jun 05, 2016 at 09:27:08PM +0000, Jon Neal wrote: > Sounds like a fantastic idea. I've definitely been bitten by this one as > well. > > I am assuming this will still keep backwards compatibility for those who > have already created boards with default sized vias? > > On Sun, Jun 5, 2016 at 5:23 PM José Ignacio <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I like both suggestions, I got bitten by the annular ring issue before > > because the DRC doesn't even check for that. > > > > On Sun, Jun 5, 2016 at 4:06 PM, Chris Pavlina <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > Just a quick warning - I'm going to update the default via size to 0.8mm > > > diam/0.4mm drill, as the current default of 0.6/0.4 isn't manufacturable > > at > > > most general purpose fabs. Annular ring too narrow. That should be > > > uncontroversial, but I'm still giving a bit of warning to make sure > > nobody's > > > too attached to that. > > > > > > Simon Wells suggested allowing that value to be read from the .pro > > instead, so > > > it can be set in the default template instead of hardcoded. I might do > > that > > > later, as it seems like a win in general. Objections? > > > > > > -- > > > Chris > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers > > > Post to : [email protected] > > > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers > > > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers > > Post to : [email protected] > > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers > > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp > >
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
