Michael, Thanks for the effort. Sorry I sent you on a wild goose chase. I guess we will have to live with 1.60 as the maximum version of boost for the stable release. This shouldn't be too much of an issue except for possibly our package devs. Hopefully there will not be too many more stable 4 releases.
Cheers, Wayne On 7/5/2016 6:11 PM, Michael Steinberg wrote: > Hello Wayne, > > Am 05.07.2016 um 17:14 schrieb Wayne Stambaugh: >> While I'm on the subject @Michael, would you please back port your boost >> context 1.61 patch? I'm sure at some point in the not too distant >> future, someone will try to build stable version 4 against boost 1.61. > After having spent the last few hours with building Kicad stable 4, I > investigated the backporting. I fear I will be unable to backport > boost::context 1.61 compatiblity to stable under the restriction of > c++03, as the library specifies c++11 as minimum (it uses <functional> > and <tuple> now f.e.). So I'm feeling a bit unfortunate. It might be > possible to come up with a hack for this particular version using the > detail namespace. I don't know if that's okay by the policy and it could > break with any new version. It could be that it's less work than I fear, > by simply retargeting the detail namespace, but I would only investigate > if that's an option at all. > > Michael > > > _______________________________________________ > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers > Post to : kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers Post to : kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
