On Thu, Mar 09, 2017 at 09:01:44PM +0100, jp charras wrote: > Le 09/03/2017 à 20:31, Chris Pavlina a écrit : > > It's faster for me now - about five seconds to load an empty schematic > > project with all the official libs, which is bearable, and about the > > same time to load a large multipage schematic with a smaller library > > set. > > > > Can we declare a verdict on whether the busy cursor is welcome still? I > > feel like five seconds is still long enough to warrant one. > > How many time to load the same things with the stable release? > The busy cursor is one thing, too many time is an other thing. > > I am thinking the stable release is faster. > Therefore there is room for more optimizations.
Slightly under one second for both projects on stable. > > > > > On Thu, Mar 09, 2017 at 08:13:20PM +0100, jp charras wrote: > >> Le 09/03/2017 à 14:05, Wayne Stambaugh a écrit : > >>> JP, > >>> > >>> If Chris is OK with these changes, please commit them. I'm sure users > >>> will appreciate the speed up. > >>> > >>> Thanks, > >>> > >>> Wayne > >> > >> OK. > >> I committed my fixes. > >> I hope I did not break something. > >> > >> Loading a large schematic project is really faster now. > >> > >> -- > >> Jean-Pierre CHARRAS > > > -- > Jean-Pierre CHARRAS > > _______________________________________________ > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers > Post to : kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers Post to : kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
