Hi Jon


On 18/04/17 21:27, Wayne Stambaugh wrote:
On 4/18/2017 9:03 AM, Tomasz Wlostowski wrote:
On 18.04.2017 14:55, Jon Evans wrote:
(branched from the component table viewer thread)

In my opinion, a schematic with multiple sheets is not like a text
editor with multiple documents.  The schematic editor is working on a
single project, and it should be way more common to apply operations
(that might want to be undone) to all schematic sheets, than it is to
apply operations across all files you happen to have open in a text
editor (other than "find in files", of course).

In my experience, other EDA tools work around the "undoing global
changes" issue that JP mentioned in the same way that text editors do
when you replace in multiple files -- they warn the user that the change
cannot be undone, and sometimes leave the files/sheets in an "unsaved"
state so there is actually a way to undo it for certain files (i.e. by
closing them without saving)

Hi Jon,

I would suggest having one schematic file per schematic sheet. This
would greatly simplify the undo/view model, while we could still have
multiple documents open in tabs. Moreover, each sheet in a separate file
would make design reuse much easier...
This would break complex hierarchies where a file is referenced in more
than one sheet.  Using separate files for each sheet actually makes
designs less reusable in complex hierarchies.  It doesn't make sense to
save the same file multiple times just for the reference designator
differences.
It would also break re-usability. I I have a schematic file that represents an instrument amp, and use it as a sheet multiple times, I'd then expect to modify the schematic once and have the change propagate across all instances of that sheet. (eg: adding an additional filter cap)

Cheers,
Tom

-Jon

On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 7:46 AM, Nox <noxfiregal...@gmail.com
<mailto:noxfiregal...@gmail.com>> wrote:

    I agree with you about the multi file editor behaviour. There it is
    natural that the undo/redo works per file. But is this behaviour
    also reasonable for a schematic? I just checked the behaviour of
    visual studio. There global replacement will be reverted if the
    stack is in sync. Else only the active document is affected. So I
    guess you are right. We have to first agree which way redo/undo
    should work. Personally I would perfere to move to a "mixed" or
    global redo/undo.

    What do you think: how hard will it be to implement a "container"
    undo/redo item which batchs multiple changes (e.g. for component
    changes, annotation, etc) and has an ID to check with all open
    sheets if the top most change matches. Of course it is questionable
    if a "silent" partial undo/redo is the best way to handle desynced
    stacks. Or might a global redo/undo will be easier to maintain? Or
    should global operations simply always "break" the local undo/redo
    stacks (so our "state of the art"-handling)?

    P.S: should we branch the discussion here maybe?



    Am 18.04.2017 um 09:12 schrieb jp charras:

        Le 17/04/2017 à 22:51, Nox a écrit :

            I know that I already suggested that in another context but
            what about changing the undo/redo
            semantic to the more common approach to maintain an global
            undo/redo stack and switch the view
            accordingly? I know that the "per screen" is the established
            way in kicad and that it is very
            dangerous to break existing workflows. But the undo/redo
            behaviour is currently hardly
            "understandable" for beginners. E.g. why does the undo not
            follow my actions but stays on one view?
            Why does exporting the netlist break the undo? Why can
            automatic annotation not be reverted? The
            undo list wiped on a frequently basis that personally i
            hardly trust into the undo functionality at
            all.

            Would it be an option to introduce a "test version" of a
            global undo/redo to get some feedback from
            the crowed which way would be preferred?

        For me, the problem is not to have a global or per screen
        undo/redo list, but what an user is
        expecting when undoing/redoing a change.

        We *always* expect to undo the last change.
        Any undo/redo system has this behavior.

        Now consider an editor (the schematic editor with 3 sheets for
        instance, but this is also the case
        of text editors with 3 files opened and currently edited).

        1 - in sheet1 you call a tool (component table editor, automatic
        annotation) which modify all sheets.

        2 - after  that you enter sheet2 and make new changes then
        sheet3 and also make new changes.

        3 - back to sheet1 and try to undelete the latest change in this
        sheet: this is the global change
        (i.e. annotation). This is possible in sheet1.
        But how can you undo this annotation in others sheets: this is
        not the latest change and cannot be
        undone safely (you can have deleted/replaced/edited a symbol in
        other sheets, or deleted a sheet):
        what is the actual meaning of "undo the annotation" in other
        sheets).

        And ultimately:
        What a undo (and therefore redo) command must undo:
        1 - the latest change in the full schematic (global undo/redo)
          or
        2 - the latest change in the currently edited (active) sheet
        (local undo/redo)

        This is a choice, and the answer is for me not trivial.

        It could be worth to know what is the option for global/local
        changes in a schematic hierarchy in
        other schematic editors.

        Multi-file text editors can undo the latest change only in the
        active file, not in all opened files.



    _______________________________________________
    Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
    <https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers>
    Post to     : kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net
    <mailto:kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net>
    Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
    <https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers>
    More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
    <https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp>




_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
Post to     : kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
Post to     : kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
Post to     : kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


--
Regards
David G
_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
Post to     : kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

Reply via email to