Without reopening this discussion, do we have a resolution on this issue? If not, what do we need to do to close this out? My preference is to keep our library licensing consistent.
Cheers, Wayne On 7/2/2017 1:00 AM, Javier Serrano wrote: > On Sun, Jul 2, 2017 at 3:33 AM, Oliver Walters > <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> > wrote: > > Let's take a step back: > > Currently we have the 3Dmodels license > - https://github.com/KiCad/packages3D/wiki/Model-Licencing > <https://github.com/KiCad/packages3D/wiki/Model-Licencing> - which > is modelled after the GEDA project (as easyw mentioned previously). > > I think this is straight-forward and is consistent with how we would > like to license symbols and footprints. > > If the existing 3Dmodels license is adapted for symbols and > footprints (only a few sentences need to be changed), is this OK? > > > Without knowing about the initiative for 3D models, but knowing already > the GEDA effort, we thought CC is more adapted than GPL for the type of > works we are discussing. > > Cheers, > > Javier (very likely offline for a week now) > > > _______________________________________________ > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers > Post to : [email protected] > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp > _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
