Please submit your patch as a pull request. 2018-02-26 4:48 GMT+01:00 Steven A. Falco <stevenfa...@gmail.com>:
> On 02/25/2018 07:31 PM, Wayne Stambaugh wrote: > > > > > > On 02/25/2018 07:25 PM, Rene Pöschl wrote: > >> On 25/02/18 23:29, Wayne Stambaugh wrote: > >>> Stephen, > >>> > >>> I would say that you should pull from HEAD of each library. This will > >>> probably be acceptable up to the stable release. At this point we will > >>> have to tag each repo. Are any of our library devs planning on doing > >>> any major reorganization of the libraries between now and the stable > >>> release? If so, than we may want to tag the library repos for rc1. > >>> > >>> Cheers, > >>> > >>> Wayne > >>> > >> > >> I asked a week or so ago if i should tag. Your response was that it is > unnecessary. Otherwise i would have tagged the libs back then. > >> l > >> As i do not yet plan to ban major changes, i tagged the repos with > "v5.0.0-rc1" > >> > > > > Rene, > > > > I don't think there is a major issue here but tagging rc1 wont hurt > anything. The main thing I am worried about is the stable release and that > the library layout structure and the library names remain constant > throughout the stable 5 release series unless the user specifically chooses > to install newer libraries. Between now and the stable release, I do > expect some changes to the libraries but we can tag as we go if we need to. > > There are a lot of issues here that I am not necessarily competent to > answer, so let me just propose a quick patch to get the copr builds to at > least use the v5 libraries instead of the v4 libraries. That will > potentially enable more Fedora users to test with a consistent v5 of kicad, > so I see it as a step in the right direction. > > I've attached the patch, and I've tested it in my copr repo here: > https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/stevenfalco/kicad/ > > Basically, this patch replaces the v4 kicad-library repo with the v5 > kicad-footprints, kicad-packages3D, kicad-templates and kicad-symbols > repos. It also sets KICAD_VERSION_EXTRA to the git "commit-count.SHA" so > the version is more visible in the help:about dialog. > > I received a pm from a developer off-list, who wants to split the package > into separate components, uncoupling the libs from the executables. That > seems like a great idea to me, and lines up with the debian proposal, but > clearly that will take more effort to put in place. > > Please let me know if this patch is acceptable, or if you need further > changes. > > Steve > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > Wayne > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers > > Post to : kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net > > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers > > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp > > > _______________________________________________ > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers > Post to : kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp > >
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers Post to : kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp