I can certainly help check it. I think Wayne would have to make a call as to whether or not it's too big a change to introduce now.
-Jon On Mon, Mar 5, 2018 at 7:59 AM, hauptmech <hauptm...@gmail.com> wrote: > While testing version 5 I realized that clearances are still not settable > (like track width or via size) and my life is going to be miserable if I > have to continue with my current work flow which is to change the default > netclass clearance to the desired clearance constantly as I lay down > different tracks which require different clearances even though they are > part of the some net. > > There is a previous thread detailing why netclass is not sufficient for > all use cases. Search for netclass in the subject. > > Anyway, I wrote most of a patch today (it's 1am in my timezone now) and > expect to finish it tomorrow. I believe I have a solution which will be > useful for those that need it and mostly invisible to those that don't. > > The question is whether there is a core developer willing to check, sign > off, and help sell it for inclusion in 5. (I'm stuck using whatever the > current stable version of kicad is when I'm working) > > This is a huge pain point for me and I'm willing to negotiate a small > bounty if that helps. > > > > _______________________________________________ > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers > Post to : kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp > >
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers Post to : kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp