On 3/7/2018 7:44 AM, Tomasz Wlostowski wrote: > On 07/03/18 12:10, Russell Oliver wrote: >> Forgive my ignorance but why would storing the clearance for each track >> segment (if required to by design intent) conflict with a sophisticated >> design rule management system? > > For example: what would happen to the clearance of the segment/via if it > has been modified by the P&S shove? What clearance should be taken if > new segments are generated by the P&S optimizer from multiple original > segments with different manually-set clearances? > > I'm not totally opposed to hauptmech's change, I just think it's too > early to merge it. We should discuss such ideas before writing code. My > goal for V6 DRC is to be able to define clearance rules for at least: > - per-net & per-netclass > - per-layer > - user-defined board areas. > > The latter two features IMHO will be more powerful than manually > overriding each segments' or via's clearance. > > Tom >
If there are other requirements, we should clearly define them before writing any new clearance code. It will save us a lot of grief in the long run. Wayne _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers Post to : kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
