Hi Seth,

On 27.02.19 17:52, Seth Hillbrand wrote:

> Would something similar address your concerns?

From the UI perspective, sure.

The main reason I proposed splitting version upgrade and load/save code
is that it might be easier to maintain in the long run as we pick up
more features and as a result of that more format versions.

If we parse any file version directly to internal structures, then
changing internals will require adapting all existing parsers, while
dedicated upgrade tools (4->5, 5->6, ...) could be stacked, and most of
them would be simple transformations. Also, these tools could be tested
separately.

   Simon

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
Post to     : kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

Reply via email to