Hi Seth, On 27.02.19 17:52, Seth Hillbrand wrote:
> Would something similar address your concerns? From the UI perspective, sure. The main reason I proposed splitting version upgrade and load/save code is that it might be easier to maintain in the long run as we pick up more features and as a result of that more format versions. If we parse any file version directly to internal structures, then changing internals will require adapting all existing parsers, while dedicated upgrade tools (4->5, 5->6, ...) could be stacked, and most of them would be simple transformations. Also, these tools could be tested separately. Simon
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers Post to : kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp