Yes, just retag the 5.1.1 tags as 5.1.2 as well. We have done that before and is probably what will have the least workload. :)
On Sun, 21 Apr 2019 at 23:44, Steven A. Falco <stevenfa...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 4/21/19 5:18 PM, Wayne Stambaugh wrote: > > It's looks like 5.1.1 has a serious issue which was fixed and will be > > released in 5.1.2. Since folks have already started downloading 5.1.1, > > I don't think changing the 5.1.1 tag is a good idea. How much trouble > > would it be to spin 5.1.2 and skip formally releasing 5.1.1? I'm fine > > if we use the 5.1.1 libraries, documentation, and translations as > > nothing has change since 5.1.1 that would effect anything. I figure > > this will give Adam some more time to get the macos release out. I > > apologize in advance for dropping the ball on this. > > My preference would be to tag all seven repositories with 5.1.2, even if > the 5.1.2 and 5.1.1 tags are on the same commit. That way, the intent is > very clear in the history of each repo. > > Changing / reusing a tag once it has been pushed is never a good idea, IMO. > > Steve > > > _______________________________________________ > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers > Post to : kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp >
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers Post to : kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp