Hi Adam I did add a testing instruction to your issue.
I am a bit curious about what the build error is that you see for mac 10.11 and ngspice 30. The other build you do are called 11.14. I assume 11.14 does not work on 11.12. It looks like the nightlies from the old nightlies build are better, the tester said: <{HD}> nickoe: I guess the last build was wack. I updated last night and the new build fixes most of the issues I was experiencing with eeschema. On Tue, 2 Jul 2019 at 17:24, Adam Wolf <adamw...@feelslikeburning.com> wrote: > > I have not yet been able to get 10.11 to build with ngspice 30. I > will only look for a little bit. Our policy would have us upgrade to > 10.12 as a minimum requirement anyway, since 10.11 no longer gets > security updates. > > Adam > > On Mon, Jul 1, 2019 at 10:03 PM Adam Wolf <adamw...@feelslikeburning.com> > wrote: > > > > I do not personally use ngspice. I have filed an issue if someone has a > > quick one to add. > > > > https://github.com/KiCad/kicad-mac-builder/issues/90 > > > > Adam > > > > On Mon, Jul 1, 2019, 9:43 PM Nick Østergaard <oe.n...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> Good news, it seems like we managed to make the kicad-mac-packaging > >> scripts happy. > >> > >> After upgrading to ngspice 30 we had to update the include path for > >> some unknown reason. But it seems like it should work now. The first > >> build has been pushed to the nightly download location. It is not been > >> repackaged for stable. I guess Adam will handle that if we don't > >> release a 5.1.3 before. > >> > >> But I don't think it is ready for primetime yet, first user of the build > >> says: > >> > >> <{HD}> haha so hitting the play button crashed all of kicad > >> <{HD}> yep, just tried again. The whole thing crashes. > >> <{HD}> This is fun and all but I am going out for dinner. I will be > >> back in a few hours. > >> > >> So if anyone else on mac could try it out? Maybe you Jeff can try it out? > >> I think he tested the unified version: > >> https://kicad-downloads.s3.cern.ch/osx/nightly/kicad-unified-20190701-113048-53e18489e-10_14.dmg > >> > >> Cheers. > >> > >> On Fri, 21 Jun 2019 at 11:16, Nick Østergaard <oe.n...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > > >> > I see no reason to make ngspice 30 a strict minimum requirement. > >> > > >> > Lets just help packagers update to the latest ngspice and we are good. > >> > > >> > tor. 13. jun. 2019 18.33 skrev Wayne Stambaugh <stambau...@gmail.com>: > >> >> > >> >> On 6/10/19 4:01 PM, Carsten Schoenert wrote: > >> >> > Hello Wayne, > >> >> > > >> >> > Am 10.06.19 um 20:15 schrieb Wayne Stambaugh: > >> >> >> We cannot make ngspice 30 the minimum version. There are far too > >> >> >> many > >> >> >> linux distros where 30 is not available yet. Please keep in mind, > >> >> >> Debian stable and the latest Ubuntu LTS version are the benchmarks > >> >> >> for > >> >> >> dependency package versions. I'm fine with packaging macos and > >> >> >> windows > >> >> >> with 30. > >> >> > > >> >> > current Debian stable (Stretch) has KiCad version 4.0.5+dfsg1-4 in the > >> >> > archive and no package libngspice0 at all (not even in non-free) so > >> >> > there is nothing to take care on here. > >> >> > > >> >> > The current Ubuntu LTS release 18.04 (Bionic Beaver) has KiCad version > >> >> > 4.0.7+dfsg1-1ubuntu2 and libngspice0 version 27-1. > >> >> > At least the KiCad version is long long outdated. So also not really > >> >> > relevant too. > >> >> > > >> >> > But all relevant current Debian releases are providing a recent KiCad > >> >> > version and also libngspice0 in version 30.2-1 (from unstable to > >> >> > stretch-backports). This is also available in all Downstream of Debian > >> >> > means also in Ubuntu >= 'Cosmic Cuttlefish' are providing KiCad > >> >> > 5.0.0+dfsg1-2, but also libngspice0 in version 27. Updates wont > >> >> > happen. > >> >> > > >> >> > But Jean-Samuel Reynaud is providing actual versions of KiCad and also > >> >> > the depending libngspice0 package and they even work in the always > >> >> > outdated Linux Mint distro. So for me your requirements you like to > >> >> > set > >> >> > are fulfilled. > >> >> > > >> >> > And normally the application is defining the requirements. Simulations > >> >> > seems to be for some users an critical option. So if the maintainers > >> >> > of > >> >> > ngspice hardly suggesting to use the most recent version of ngspice in > >> >> > recent KiCad version I would strongly consider to increase this build > >> >> > dependency. > >> >> > > >> >> > In the end it's up to the KiCad maintainers to define the requirements > >> >> > for KiCad. It was a long road to get ngspice into Debian main but in > >> >> > the > >> >> > end it happened, big thanks to Holger again btw! So Debian has no > >> >> > problem to provide KiCad with a depending libngspice0 library >= 30.2. > >> >> > > >> >> > >> >> Is this a problem for any of the other package devs? If not, I have no > >> >> issue with bumping the minimum version to 30. If this prevents any > >> >> other platforms from being built, then it will have to wait. > >> >> > >> >> Cheers, > >> >> > >> >> Wayne > >> >> > >> >> _______________________________________________ > >> >> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers > >> >> Post to : kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net > >> >> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers > >> >> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers > >> Post to : kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net > >> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers > >> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers Post to : kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp