@Wayne I think the current one is fine. @Kevin, And the version is not just the tag and number of commits, but also the sha1.
On Mon, 8 Jul 2019 at 20:23, Wayne Stambaugh <stambau...@gmail.com> wrote: > > It used to be 6.0.0-dev but apparently this caused package version > issues so it was dropped in favor of the current version tagging scheme. > There has already been at least one confused bug reporter about the > current versioning scheme. Honestly, I don't have a strong preference > one way or another. If someone can come up with a system that's > workable for everyone, that's fine by me. I don't have an issue with > using something like 5.99.0. > > Cheers, > > Wayne > > On 7/8/2019 1:45 PM, Kevin Cozens wrote: > > Greetings, all. > > > > I just ran across something odd with the version number shown by the > > KiCad program(s). > > > > I compiled and installed git master. When I ran it the version number > > reported is 5.1.0.1195. As I also compile and run the 5.1 version I > > thought I had a mix up when I did the compile. When I checked my 5.1 > > install it has 5.1.2.109 as the version number. > > > > I would expect git master to report a version number higher than the 5.1 > > branch. Perhaps 5.2, or even as high as 5.9 as it is going to be > > released as 6 something, IIRC. > > > > _______________________________________________ > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers > Post to : kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers Post to : kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp