i've had this problem recently too. i'm not sure what the difference was,
but if i made the vias by starting a trace and immediately placing the via,
they'd often show up with the correct net name (also ground in my case).
when i saved and re-opened the file, however, the vias would no longer be
connected to the net and would throw lots of errors in the DRC.

sorry i can't help more, hopefully someone else can give a better answer!

- seth


On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 1:20 PM, alm_flickr <[email protected]> wrote:

>
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm fairly new to kicad. I've decided to try kicad because I'm not entirely
> happy with gEDA. So far kicad looks more polished, but I haven't done an
> in-depth comparison yet. My first impression was pretty good, although I
> wasn't too happy about eeschema crashing X (haven't tried to reproduce it
> yet, so don't have enough information for a proper bug report).
>
> Anyway, I tried to do a simple two layer board layout with a solid ground
> plane on the bottom and a ground trace around the edges (both are zones). I
> want to stitch these zones together with a bunch of vias, but since there is
> no component connected to the zone on the top layer, pcbnew refuses to
> connect these two. Even when disabling DRC, it still won't do it (plus I
> don't really want to disable DRC for the whole board).
>
> The solution I've found is to add a bunch of 1 pin connectors to the
> schematic, connect them all to ground, and associate them with a module
> based on the 1PIN module (but smaller). This will allow pcbnew to connect
> them together. But I find it ugly to have to change my schematic based on
> the number of via's; these are purely layout elements that don't belong in
> the schematic. Another disadvantage is that a module will generate thermals,
> unless you disable them for the whole zone, but that's not a problem in this
> design.
>
> How do you handle these connections that only appear on the PCB and not in
> the schematic, and more specifically, stitching ground planes with vias?
>
> Regards,
> Alson
>
>

Reply via email to