Looking at the documentation listed on the Fedora Project, I see a reference to the %end tag.
Under the title heading " Creating the Kickstart File" you will find this: "Old-style kickstart syntax does not specify for any end token after the %packages section or scripts. In this case, the following section order is required. New-style kickstart syntax requires using %end following these sections, which means that ordering is not required" http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Anaconda/Kickstart I think this works in Fedora and not CentOS where I actually had to remove them. So I guess the %end is bleeding edge while the rest of the body has yet to accept it into common practice. Greg Greg Haase [email protected] On 9/30/10 9:14 AM, "Steve Robson" <[email protected]> wrote: > [email protected] wrote: >> Subject: The %end tag causes errors >> From: whitivery <[email protected]> >> Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2010 07:35:21 +0200 >> >> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> >> >> In a CentOS 5.5 kickstart file, adding %end to mark the end of the >> %packages, %pre, or %post sections causes an error. In the first two >> cases the kickstart fails and stops. For the %post it gives an error >> message but it has already run all of my post steps so it doesn't have a >> functional impact. >> >> Without the %end lines, the kickstart file works fine. > > Hi there, > > Not sure where you got "%end" from but I've never heard of it or used > it. It's not mentioned in the RHEL5 kickstart documentation starting at > http://docs.redhat.com/docs/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/5/html/Installation > _Guide/s1-kickstart2-file.html _______________________________________________ Kickstart-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/kickstart-list
