Hi Mehnaz,
In our previous experience we have found that phrases which are shorter
than 3 symbols are too ambiguous and carry little benefit to the IE
process. That is why the gazetteer skips short labels on initialization.
It is true that in some special cases they might be useful. That is why
we have included a tool to customize the init process of the gazetteer.
It is present in version 3 of the KIM platform.
If you provide some more info on the use case we will try to provide a
good solution.
Greetings,
Philip
On 08/26/2009 06:47 AM, Mehnaz Adnan wrote:
Hi Philip
I tried to use rdfs:comment property in this way
<http://www.ontotext.com/kim/2006/05/wkb#K>
<http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type>
<http://proton.semanticweb.org/2006/05/protont#MedicalAbbreviation> .
<http://www.ontotext.com/kim/2006/05/wkb#K>
<http://proton.semanticweb.org/2006/05/protons#generatedBy>
<http://www.ontotext.com/kim/2006/05/wkb#Gazetteer> .
<http://www.ontotext.com/kim/2006/05/wkb#K>
<http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label> "K" .
<http://www.ontotext.com/kim/2006/05/wkb#K.001>
<http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type>
<http://proton.semanticweb.org/2006/05/protons#Alias> .
<http://www.ontotext.com/kim/2006/05/wkb#K.001>
<http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label> "K" .
<http://www.ontotext.com/kim/2006/05/wkb#K>
<http://proton.semanticweb.org/2006/05/protons#hasAlias>
<http://www.ontotext.com/kim/2006/05/wkb#K.001> .
<http://www.ontotext.com/kim/2006/05/wkb#K.001>
<http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment> "Potassium" .
But I does not generate annotation for the term "K" in my text, while
it is generating annotations for all others in which I did not
included comment property. I tried to do it by a custom property as
well but i did not work.
Please advice.
Thanks and Regards
Mehnaz
2009/8/24 Philip Alexiev <philip.alex...@sirma.bg
<mailto:philip.alex...@sirma.bg>>
Hi Mehnaz,
It is conceptually incorrect to have instances of more than one
class. My advice is to fix the model and not hack the recognition.
About the second question, it is strange to me that you don't want
the complete name of the abbreviation recognized. A solution I
would recommend, is to use the rdfs:comment property to describe
the full alias. It will be shown as a description of the entity in
the KB Explorer (popup window) and will not be used in the
information extraction process. Another way is to use your custom
property, which will be displayed in the list of properties for
that entity.
Hope this helps,
Philip
On 08/23/2009 09:46 PM, Mehnaz Adnan wrote:
Hi,
I have a named entities "US" and "Ultrasound" both of these
are instances of two classes
<http://proton.semanticweb.org/2006/05/protont#InformationResource>
and <http://proton.semanticweb.org/2006/05/protonu#Company>
When I view the annotations in GATE it annotates both "US" and
"Ultrasound" for "Organization" and not for "Object". I am
testing so just using KIM's ontologies for Populating wkb.nt. I
am attaching my wkb file as well.
Next question:
I want to use KIM to annotate abbreviations. For example AF -
Atrial Fibliration
for that I want to annotate "AF" and want to show "Atrial
Fibliration" as alias in KIM Web UI (Popup window). But I do not
want to annotate Atrial Fibliration in the text. As I understand
KIM loaded labels from Aliases so I am Stuck how to do it.
Please help
--
Mehnaz Adnan
Ph.D. Candidate,
Department of Computer Science-Tamaki
University of Auckland
email: madn...@aucklanduni.ac.nz <mailto:madn...@aucklanduni.ac.nz>
--
Mehnaz Adnan
Ph.D. Candidate,
Department of Computer Science-Tamaki
University of Auckland
Phone: 09-3737599 ext 83274
email: madn...@aucklanduni.ac.nz <mailto:madn...@aucklanduni.ac.nz>
_______________________________________________
Kim-discussion mailing list
Kim-discussion@ontotext.com
http://ontotext.com/mailman/listinfo/kim-discussion
