On 12/9/10 12:56 AM, Dempster, Kennett wrote: > I attended the LAJUG presentation of Kitty. Not sure who may have written in > before, but I will do my best to summarize some of the thoughts that came out > of the presentation. > > * Several of us liked the idea of a command line JMX tool independent of the > tool you are building to make administering tomcat prime time. > * I suggested making Kitty into a pluggable architecture where the tomcat > specific groovy scripts are just a plug in used by your command line JMX > tool. This would require some pluming work to be done and forethought into > how one would plug into the tool. This opens the door for a separate Tomcat > 6 and Tomcat 7 plugs. JVM JMX general stuff could be another plug-in. This > type of architecture would allow users of the tool to write their own plugs > for their own specific needs depending on the Tomcat environment they are > running. It also opens the door for people to build or contribute plug-ins > not even related to Tomcat. > * I would also suggest spending some time thinking about how users could > override and extend some of the functionality that you have for administering > Tomcat. > > These are my thoughts and seemed to be shared by others that where at the > presentation. I hope you find some value in them.
Excellent, thanks! p
0x62590808.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
