sounds good to me On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 1:33 PM, Matthew Sacks <[email protected]>wrote:
> > > > On Apr 10, 2011, at 4:54 PM, Felipe Carvalho wrote: > > > A webinar or a simple screencast would help a lot on troubleshooting. > > I'll set something up then in the near future and record it as we all span > different timezones across the globe. > We can demonstrate getting set up in STS, Eclipse and IntelliJ. Sound > good? > > > > > Indepent of the IDE, though, I would suggest putting the project under an > > automated build tool structure (Maven, Gradle, whatever) instead of Ant, > > which makes it easier for developers to choose their preferred IDE. > > > > Many IDEs integrate seamless with Maven and Grails projects (NetBeans and > > Intellij are great examples of this) for example, which facilitates for > > developers to switch between IDEs. > > > > One thing I can say about Intellij (I've been working with it for the > last 6 > > months) is that it's got the best Groovy integration I've seen among > major > > IDEs -- I had tried Eclipse (STS) and NetBeans before. > > > > On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 8:11 PM, Matthew Sacks <[email protected] > >wrote: > > > >> Hi Folks, > >> I have struggled a bit using Eclipse with Groovy projects previously > >> (although for all intensive purposes it will work) , so I personally > >> recommend using IntelliJ for developing kitty projects as a matter of > >> preference. I'm not sure if you have to be an official committer, but I > know > >> Jetbrains, the company that makes IntelliJ offers a special open source > use > >> license to the ASF: > >> > http://www.jetbrains.com/eforms/openSourceRequestApache.action?licenseRequest=IIOSA > >> > >> That being said, I'd like to throw it out there that maybe it would help > >> the new people on board if we hosted a simple webinar (and recorded it) > on > >> how to get all set up to be developing for Kitty and resolve problems > >> getting setup. Would this be helpful? > >> > >> > >> msacks > >
