On 31/05/2011 19:26, Kevan Miller wrote: > > On May 31, 2011, at 1:11 PM, Matthew Sacks wrote: > >> Hi Guys, >> I've noticed a lot of people have become quite active on this project. This >> is exciting news and the progress on getting kitty to be a useful JMX tool >> has been quite a bit in a short amount of time. For those of you wanting to >> get more involved, I would recommend you apply to be a committer. If you are >> interested, you basically fill out a CLA (Committer License Agreement) and >> then the Kitty community would vote you in. For more information see >> http://incubator.apache.org/guides/ppmc.html?#Voting+in+a+new+committer. >> >> If you have questions, feel free to post them to this list. > > Hi Matthew and Kitty PMC, > Want to be sure we're clear on a few things... It is the PMC's responsibility > to monitor their community. The PMC is expected to review svn commits, > discussions on the mailing lists, etc. The PMC is expected to monitor > contributions to the community (code patches, mailing list discussions, etc), > discuss the merits of individual contributors, and where the PMC feels it is > appropriate -- discuss and vote new committers into the project. The > discussion and vote typically will occur on the kitty-private mailing list.
+1 > You can't just "apply to be a committer". +1 > Contributors can certainly let the community know that they would be > interested in becoming a committer. However, it's ultimately the > responsibility of the PMC, not contributors. > > So, my message to the PMC is -- take an active role in reviewing the makeup > of your community. Do not wait for someone to apply for the position... +1 p
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
