On Wed, 26 Oct 2011 10:54:16 -0400 Jack <ostrof...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
> Good morning, > > One of the problems I have importing OFX statements for my checking > account is with checks that are cashed long after I wrote them. If > I have not manually entered a check in the ledger, than I simply > change all the necessary fields in the imported transaction. > However, if I have already entered the transaction manually, I just > have to delete the newly imported one. Unfortunately, I usually > forget that I did so, alter the new transaction, and only discover I > now have a duplicate transaction when the balance doesn't match. > This wouldn't be a problem for me if the transactions were matched. > The current matching will clearly not do it, since the dates are too > far apart (as much as two months) but the check numbers and amounts > are the same, and check numbers should be unique within account. > > I'll be glad to submit a wishlist - but I want to check whether > anybody sees any reason this would be a bad idea. I would propose > that after the current matching logic is applied, if the imported > transaction has not matched, then try to match it by check number and > amount, even if the date seems far apart. > > > Jack While not OFX, my cheque numbers are in the detail field when imported. Allan _______________________________________________ KMyMoney-devel mailing list KMyMoney-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kmymoney-devel
