https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=337251
--- Comment #17 from geo...@wildturkeyranch.net --- (In reply to allan from comment #16) > On 17/07/14 19:21, Cristian Oneț wrote: > > https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=337251 > > > > --- Comment #15 from Cristian Oneț <onet.crist...@gmail.com> --- > > Indeed if the 'Buy' is replaced with a 'BuyX' in the attached Qif file the > > brokerage account is created as expected and the transaction does not need > > to > > be touched. Does this mean that the application works as expected and this > > can > > be closed? > > I think it best to wait a bit for any comment from the poster. > > I there a specification for investments in the QIF format somewhere? > > > > Not specifically for investments, just as part of the overall > description. I think perhaps > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quicken_Interchange_Format is most useful > as it has a number of hints, links and references. One of these is useful - > http://web.archive.org/web/20100222214101/http://web.intuit.com/support/ > quicken/docs/d_qif.html > . > > Allan This seems strange. BUY would be what Quicken puts out from a combined account (i.e. security/brokerage in one account). I is my impression that the "X" suffix ishttp://www.respmech.com/mym2qifw/qif_new.htm used if the security is paid for from another (Quicken) account. In my full QIF dump of 7 or 8 security accounts I only see BUYX in the Prices data. Here is a reference to BUYX: http://www.respmech.com/mym2qifw/qif_new.htm That said, the issue I submitted this bug report for was what was happening when I imported a Quicken QIF and found "missing cat" errors on all the security transactions. And then when I tried to fix it, the edit routine produced the Brokerage account as a default, which should have allowed me to just push the "Enter" button, but it was greyed out. Even this is a lot of work given that we are "traders" and have a LOT of transactions to process. Given all this, I have written a script to pre-process the QIF. Should I be replacing all the BUYs with BUYX?? Given that QIF is (in my opinion) the best way to move to a new accounting program and that KMM does not handle all actions I think it would be nice if the KMM project posted the QIF spec it is implementing. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ KMyMoney-devel mailing list KMyMoney-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kmymoney-devel