https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=427519
--- Comment #13 from Daryl Lautenschlager <dard...@charter.net> --- Jack, I found the transaction you referenced. It was from 12/31/92 and indeed did a transfer from an account back to itself. Since it was a zero sum change, I just deleted the transaction. I did a consistency check and no problems were found. I tried doing the merge again and ran into the same problem. I have attached an updated anonymous file with the 12/31/92 transaction removed. Is there anything I can be looking for that might be causing this problem? On 11/7/20 4:05 PM, Jack wrote: > https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=427519 > > Jack <ostrof...@users.sourceforge.net> changed: > > What |Removed |Added > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Resolution|WAITINGFORINFO |--- > Ever confirmed|0 |1 > Status|NEEDSINFO |CONFIRMED > > --- Comment #11 from Jack <ostrof...@users.sourceforge.net> --- > I finally had time to download the file and I can confirm the error. You also > get the same error trying to delete P003804 and assign the transactions to > P005411. I get no error doing the same with P003550. That at least give a > hint the problem is related to P003804. However, in process of looking for > anything strange. I noticed a console error: > > Problem determining the category for transaction ' "T000000000000015349" '. > Reason: Split not found for account !A000069 > /build/kmymoney/src/kmymoney-5.1.0/kmymoney/mymoney/mymoneytransaction.cpp:278 > > Oddly, if I search for that transaction, it seems to be a transfer from and to > account A000069, for a different Payee. There ARE two splits for the > transaction, but both for A000069, and there is no assigned Category for the > transaction. Given that action="Transfer", I'm not sure if a Category should > be necessary. I'm guessing that A000069 is a Brokerage account, due to the > presence of Investment transactions in it, but again, I don't know if it > matters. > > I'll keep digging to see if I can find any other problems with the file, but I > do wonder whether the consistency check should find that type of problem. > -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.