http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=4045
M. de Rooy <m.de.r...@rijksmuseum.nl> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|Signed Off |Passed QA
--- Comment #72 from M. de Rooy <m.de.r...@rijksmuseum.nl> ---
QA Comment
If maxreserves would have been a new development and Holds was a perfect
module, this should have failed QA :)
But we are in another situation. The missing maxreserves for long time already
is really bad.
My test results show me that there are still some discrepancies and points to
resolve.
We could see this patch as the starting point for that.
Since this report already has quite a history, I am passing QA on it in the
perspective noted. Leaving final judgement to RM or perhaps a second QA
opinion?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
_______________________________________________
Koha-bugs mailing list
Koha-bugs@lists.koha-community.org
http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs
website : http://www.koha-community.org/
git : http://git.koha-community.org/
bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
