http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=12933
Martin Renvoize <martin.renvo...@ptfs-europe.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe
| |.com
--- Comment #23 from Martin Renvoize <martin.renvo...@ptfs-europe.com> ---
(In reply to Kyle M Hall from comment #16)
> (In reply to Jonathan Druart from comment #15)
I agree with Joubu that I don't like having a second GetOverdues added to the
code.. it's not DRY.. if you really want to be able to access the function from
C4::Members rather than directly from C4::Overdues, then it should be a sugar
function that refers to C4::Overdues in my mind, else it's confusing to future
people working on the code. If it does perform a different function.. then
surely that should be made clear by naming it something completely different,
or enahcning the C4::Overdues function with the required extras and a filter
perhaps?
Just my thoughts
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
_______________________________________________
Koha-bugs mailing list
Koha-bugs@lists.koha-community.org
http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs
website : http://www.koha-community.org/
git : http://git.koha-community.org/
bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
