http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=6427
--- Comment #619 from Kyle M Hall <k...@bywatersolutions.com> --- I must disagree. This work closely resembles the original RFC some table and column name changes, as well as a few additions. I've spend countless hours to track this feature against master. Nothing has moved on. It has simply been a lack of persons willing to test and qa this feature that has been the problem so far. (In reply to Martin Renvoize from comment #618) > Further to the above, when I attempted to lookup the original RFC for this, > it does not remotely resemble the actually work, further confusing testing. > > Please don't see this as completely negative.. I just feel things have moved > on allot since this patch was written.. and that the way in which it has > been posted as one massive bug is unmanageable for both testers and qa team. > > I have a alternative schema I'd love to post as a counter patch.. but that > all depends upon having a moment to get to it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug. You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list Koha-bugs@lists.koha-community.org http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
