http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=14048
--- Comment #5 from Kyle M Hall <k...@bywatersolutions.com> --- (In reply to Katrin Fischer from comment #4) > I think Sheila has a good point - maybe the dependence on HomeOrHolding is > not the best option here and we need something that is a bit more flexible? > > Only other thing is maybe the column name - refund_lost_item_fee_on_return > is quite a bit to write, maybe just refund_lost_on_return? :) (In reply to Jonathan Druart from comment #2) > The plan of attack looks good to me. > I am just wondering if the field branches.refund_lost_item_fee_on_return > makes sense. > Don't you think it would be better to set this rule in the "Circulation and > fine rules" page (admin/smart-rules.pl)? It would be easy to change the > behavior for all libraries (if only a default rule is defined). Jonathan, I believe moving this to the circulation rules is at odds with what Sheila is looking for. The only way to make both work will be to add a new system preference to choose which circulation rule to select. Something like RefundLostOnReturnControl. The options could be CheckinLibrary, PatronLibrary, ItemHomeBranch and ItemHoldingbranch. What do you think? Given this, should we still make this a circulation rule setting? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list Koha-bugs@lists.koha-community.org http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
