http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=5984
Ian Walls <ian.wa...@bywatersolutions.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ian.walls@bywatersolutions. | |com --- Comment #28 from Ian Walls <ian.wa...@bywatersolutions.com> 2011-11-19 15:22:04 UTC --- I'm not sure I agree with the approach this feature takes; specifying a large and complex set of criteria for bulk hiding of items makes for a very difficult feature to debug (as we've seen lately with this feature being broken). Wouldn't it make more sense to just add a "hidden" or "visibility" field to the items table? Then any item could be masked in the OPAC (or staff client). If we took in more than just 0 or 1, then we could have levels of invisibility (this would be good for biblio-level suppression, as well). For example, anonymous views can see hidden = 0, logged in users gain hidden = 1, staff can see hidden = 2, etc. We've got a bulk item editor, so making these changes in bulk would be pretty simple; we'd just need to identify the criteria. A small ergonomic change to the Reports interface to allow the direct pushing of a report to the bulk editor would make these convenient and seamless. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA Contact for the bug. You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list Koha-bugs@lists.koha-community.org http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/