http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=14370
--- Comment #9 from Marcel de Rooy <m.de.r...@rijksmuseum.nl> --- (In reply to Joy Nelson from comment #6) > If additional values are not allowed (i.e. not functional as '1') for > RESTRICTED, then it probably should not be a field that runs off an > 'authorised_value' list. Either hard code it like the 942$n suppress value > or allow additional values. Agreed. I think we are close to reaching consensus about the restricted>0 approach. But we need to warn libraries that added restricted values for some reason and still expect checkouts. I would not like to add a syspref on top of that. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list Koha-bugs@lists.koha-community.org http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
