http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=7167
--- Comment #31 from M. de Rooy <m.de.r...@rijksmuseum.nl> 2011-12-15 09:14:21 UTC --- Just some comments from testing again: The distinction between nonlinear and linear by using DEBUG is a good thing! Patch 2 and 3 need rebasing. If you do, could you squash everything? Will make it easier for additional testers. If the last db rev fails (as in your examples), you allow access to the staff client (in standard mode) and you are not going to update page again, I wonder if that's what you want. There is a problem and shouldn't it be solved first? If in dev mode I run the third db rev only WHILE table already EXISTS, I feel that the returned message is not so clear. And if I do not mark it as OK and I come back at update page, I can still execute it again. Would it not be better to mark it as Failed? Clicking Home in dev mode still brings me to update page (earlier comment!). About says: 3.6.2.1 / 3.7.1.3, but I did not install 1 & 2 ? Personally, I do not prefer the A .. B, C .. D listing that is now possible too. Since this is a larger change, I do not feel that my tests and [probably] those of Chris N really cover all situations. Wouldn't it be better to ask for some additional signoffs too? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list Koha-bugs@lists.koha-community.org http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
