https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=15516
--- Comment #3 from Julian Maurice <julian.maur...@biblibre.com> --- (In reply to Jonathan Druart from comment #2) > Maybe you could add a foreign key to borrowers.borrowernumber to list the > reserve group of a given patron. The link to the borrowers table is already there in reserves table, and this makes me think the schema is inconsistent because it allows grouping reserves for different borrowers. Maybe reserves.borrowernumber should be moved to reserve_group (and all reserves should belong to a group, even if the group only contains one reserve). What do you think ? > > - I don't know how to indicates in the interface that two or more > > reserves are only one request in reality. > > What do you plan to implement next? > If the reserve groups were named, and linked to a patron, you could display > these infos. Next steps would be to change the interface to reflect that change everywhere we display holds. And implement that in OPAC too. In the tables that show all holds of a patron I can group visually the holds of the same "reserve_group", but I can't do that on tables that show only a title's holds for instance. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list Koha-bugs@lists.koha-community.org http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
