https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=15666
--- Comment #7 from bondiurbano <cost...@gmail.com> --- (In reply to Katrin Fischer from comment #6) > Looking at your example - I think what happened is: > > The item was checked out on the 26th with due date 26th, but after the > auto_renewal job was run for that day. > > On the 27th in the morning the job was run again, but the item was overdue > by then - so renewal was blocked. > > That makes sense to me to be honest. I am not sure how to avoid that. > > > I think if the "No renewal before" is empty, we could agree that it should > > try on the due date - but witht he parameter set the behaviour should be > > changed. > > NOT be changed... :) Katrin, I have finished my tests. My conclusion is that automatic_renewals.pl works fine if "No renewals before" is informed in the issuing rules, i.e., "No renewals before" is mandatory for that automatic_renewals.pl works fine. Otherwise (my case) it doesn't update the due date of the loan. I will update my internal procedures to adopt this approach. Thanks for you patience. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list Koha-bugs@lists.koha-community.org http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
