http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=7167
--- Comment #43 from Ian Walls <ian.wa...@bywatersolutions.com> 2012-01-06 14:08:47 UTC --- Chris N, QA is not strictly assessing the validity of the code and it's conformity to our established coding guidelines. It also takes into consideration larger implications of the code being submitted, the possibilities of regressions and the risks of introducing new bugs. Perhaps I'm overstating the scope as others understand it, but this is my understanding. That said, having another status to mark this other than "Failed QA" would be good, because the code itself isn't technically invalid. Perhaps "Planning" or "In Discussion"... ? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list Koha-bugs@lists.koha-community.org http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
