https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=10459
Marcel de Rooy <m.de.r...@rijksmuseum.nl> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|Signed Off |In Discussion
--- Comment #32 from Marcel de Rooy <m.de.r...@rijksmuseum.nl> ---
(In reply to Kyle M Hall from comment #31)
> I really dislike having a field name being the same as a mysql data type. I
> think it introduces ambiguity. Would you or anyone else be opposed to naming
> it "updated_on"?
Have a look the discussion from some time ago.
I introduced bortimestamp (an ugly but unique name so no ambiguous column
problems), but the majority pressed me back to use timestamp and first
resolving possible clashes in joins here and there..
Moving this back to In Discussion
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
_______________________________________________
Koha-bugs mailing list
Koha-bugs@lists.koha-community.org
http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs
website : http://www.koha-community.org/
git : http://git.koha-community.org/
bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
