https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=16527
Jonathan Druart <jonathan.dru...@bugs.koha-community.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |10067 CC| |ei...@sysmystic.com, | |jonathan.dru...@bugs.koha-c | |ommunity.org --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Druart <jonathan.dru...@bugs.koha-community.org> --- It seems that it is a regression introduced by bug 10067. I'd say that the following diff will fix it: diff --git a/circ/circulation.pl b/circ/circulation.pl index 66b3dcf..d7fcfbb 100755 --- a/circ/circulation.pl +++ b/circ/circulation.pl @@ -166,7 +166,7 @@ my $stickyduedate = $query->param('stickyduedate') || $session->param('stickydu my $duedatespec = $query->param('duedatespec') || $session->param('stickyduedate'); $duedatespec = eval { output_pref( { dt => dt_from_string( $duedatespec ), dateformat => 'iso' }); } if ( $duedatespec ); -my $restoreduedatespec = $query->param('restoreduedatespec') || $session->param('stickyduedate') || $duedatespec; +my $restoreduedatespec = $query->param('restoreduedatespec') || $duedatespec || $session->param('stickyduedate'); if ($restoreduedatespec eq "highholds_empty") { undef $restoreduedatespec; } But I have no idea if it won't break bug 10067. Eivin, could you have a look please? Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=10067 [Bug 10067] decreaseLoanHighHolds messes with specify due date -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list Koha-bugs@lists.koha-community.org http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/