https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=17967
Jonathan Druart <jonathan.dru...@bugs.koha-community.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #59451|0 |1 is obsolete| | --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Druart <jonathan.dru...@bugs.koha-community.org> --- Created attachment 61628 --> https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/attachment.cgi?id=61628&action=edit Bug 17967: TT syntax for notices - Prove that ODUE is compatible Nothing new here, unless we are introducing a regression. The items.fine is a trick of our historical syntax. We need to provide a way to access this value from the a notice template using the TT syntax. A bug 17976 has been opened for discussion. Test plan: Define ODUE and OVERDUES_SLIP notice templates and use it to generate overdue notices from the cronjob script (misc/cronjobs/overdue_notices.pl) or the interface (members/print_overdues.pl). You should be able to generate the same notices with and without using the TT syntax -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list Koha-bugs@lists.koha-community.org http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/